Vol.35 (Aug) 2025 | Article no.26 2025
Superconductivity (SC) arises when electrons form Cooper pairs that move collectively without resistance. In the weak-coupling regime, this pairing is described by the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory, where electrons form weakly bound, overlapping Cooper pairs. In the opposite, strong-coupling limit, electrons form tightly bound bosonic pairs that undergo Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC). The smooth evolution between these two regimes—the BCS-BEC crossover—has been extensively studied in ultracold atomic gases [34,35,36]. Whether and how this crossover occurs in solids, particularly in strongly correlated electron systems, is now an active frontier in condensed matter physics. [37].
Organic superconductors, especially those of the κ-type, offer a promising platform for exploring this crossover. These materials have a quasi-two-dimensional anisotropic triangular lattice and host strong electron–electron interactions and geometrical frustration [38]. Among them, κ-(BEDT-TTF)4Hg2.89Br8 (κ-HgBr) is a promising candidate to realize the BCS-BEC crossover [39], possessing a spin-liquid-like metallic state and superconductivity near the Mott insulating phase. Importantly, its electron correlation strength can be tuned via external pressure, offering a rare opportunity to explore strongly correlated superconductivity across different regimes.
In our recent work [40], we theoretically investigated the possibility of a BCS-BEC crossover in κ-HgBr and related compounds by studying an extended Hubbard model on an anisotropic triangular lattice, including intradimer degrees of freedom. Using a variational Monte Carlo method, we evaluated several physical observables relevant to superconductivity, such as the superconducting correlation function PSC, coherence length ξ, superfluid weight Ds, and chemical potential μ, across a range of electron interaction strengths and doping levels.
Our key finding is that the BCS-BEC crossover emerges at a hole doping rate of δ = 0.06, where superconductivity remains robust even in the strongly correlated regime. Figure 3a illustrates the behavior of PSC ~ < c+c+cc > as a function of the on-site Coulomb interaction U/t for different doping rates. For δ = 0, superconductivity is suppressed by a transition to a Mott insulating phase. For δ = 0.11, a charge-ordered stripe phase appears, again destroying superconductivity. Only for δ = 0.06, PSC exhibit a dome-shaped profile: it first increases and then decreases with increasing U/t, a hallmark of the BCS-BEC crossover. The superconducting gap, however, increases monotonically with U/t, indicating that while local pair formation strengthens, long-range coherence weakens.
a U/t dependence of superconducting correlation function PSC for different doping rates. b U/t dependence of coherence length kFξ for δ = 0.06, where kF indicates the Fermi wave number. Adapted from Ref. [40] with modifications
This inverse behavior between the gap amplitude and PSC is a characteristic signature of the crossover. It reflects the transition from BCS-type long-range coherence to BEC-type local pairing. In addition, as shown in Fig. 3b, the coherence length kFξ becomes of order unity in this region, satisfying another important criterion for the crossover.
Further insight is gained by analyzing the superfluid weight Ds. While it decreases with increasing U/t, a deviation from its expected trend suggests a reduction in superfluid density ns, consistent with the formation of tightly bound pairs that are less mobile. The chemical potential μ also shows nontrivial behavior: while it does not drop below zero as in dilute Fermi gases, it decreases beyond a certain U/t, signaling a decoupling of fermionic quasiparticles from the Fermi surface.
These findings point to a unique form of the BCS-BEC crossover in strongly correlated lattice systems. Unlike in ultracold gases, where the crossover is driven by tuning an attractive interaction, here it emerges from repulsive electron interactions mediated by spin exchange mechanisms. Moreover, the presence or absence of competing phases, such as Mott or stripe order, plays a crucial role. In κ-HgBr, geometrical frustration suppresses these competing states, allowing superconductivity to survive and enabling the crossover to be realized.
From an experimental perspective, our results suggest strategies to access the BCS-BEC crossover in organic materials. Tuning U/t via physical or chemical pressure, controlling the doping level, and enhancing geometrical frustration are all promising approaches. For example, the application of pressure increases the transfer integral t, effectively reducing U/t and potentially moving the system through the crossover regime. Chemical substitution in the anion layers can provide additional tuning knobs, and recent advances in electric-double-layer transistor techniques may even allow controlled doping in undoped systems [41].
Our study highlights how the interplay of strong correlations, frustration, and doping can give rise to unconventional superconducting states. The BCS-BEC crossover, long considered a theoretical curiosity in solid-state systems, may be within reach in organic materials like κ-HgBr. This opens the door to further exploration of exotic pairing mechanisms and could provide new insights into high-temperature superconductivity and quantum criticality. We hope that our work will motivate both theoretical and experimental efforts to deepen our understanding of this rich crossover phenomenon in complex electron systems.
K.S. Novoselov et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004)
A.K. Geim, I.V. Van der Grigorieva, Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013)
Novoselov, KS, Mishchenko, A, Carvalho, A & Castro Neto, AH. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016).
Du, L. et al. Moiré photonics and optoelectronics. Science 379, eadg0014 (2023).
L. Du et al., Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 193–206 (2021)
L. Du et al., Nonlinear physics of moiré superlattices. Nat. Mater. 23, 1179–1192 (2024)
N. Mounet et al., Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252 (2018)
Y. Chen et al., Two-dimensional metal nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 118, 6409–6455 (2018)
Y. Xing et al., Quantum Griffiths singularity of superconductor-metal transition in Ga thin films. Science 350, 542–545 (2015)
R.A. Maniyara et al., Tunable plasmons in ultrathin metal films. Nat. Photon. 13, 328–333 (2019)
T. Zhang et al., Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111). Nat. Phys. 6, 104–108 (2010)
B. Jäck et al., Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel. Science 364, 1255–1259 (2019)
N. Briggs et al., Atomically thin half-van der Waals metals enabled by confinement heteroepitaxy. Nat. Mater. 19, 637–643 (2020)
T.K. Sahu et al., Microwave synthesis of molybdenene from MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1430–1438 (2023)
J. Gou et al., Two-dimensional ferroelectricity in a single-element bismuth monolayer. Nature 617, 67–72 (2023)
M.A. Steves et al., Unexpected near-infrared to visible nonlinear optical properties from 2-d polar metals. Nano Lett. 20, 8312–8318 (2020)
F.-F. Zhu et al., Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat. Mater. 14, 1020–1025 (2015)
F. Reis et al., Bismuthene on a SiC substrate: a candidate for a high-temperature quantum spin Hall material. Science 357, 287–290 (2017)
K.-H. Jin, E. Oh, R. Stania, F. Liu, H.W. Yeom, Enhanced Berry Curvature Dipole and Persistent Spin Texture in the Bi(110) Monolayer. Nano Lett. 21, 9468–9475 (2021)
Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 037402 (2012).
M.-Q. Ren et al., Tuning the electronic states and superconductivity in alkali fulleride films. AAPPS Bull. 32, 1 (2022)
J. Zhao et al., Realization of 2D metals at the ångström thickness limit. Nature 639, 354–359 (2025)
J. Sanchez-Yamagishi, Metals squeezed to thickness of two atoms. Nature 639, 309 (2025)
L. Li et al., Epitaxy of wafer-scale single-crystal MoS2 monolayer via buffer layer control. Nat. Commun. 15, 1825 (2024)
L. Chen et al., Exceptional electronic transport and quantum oscillations in thin bismuth crystals grown inside van der Waals materials. Nat. Mater. 23, 741–746 (2024)
K. Jiang et al., Mechanical cleavage of non-van der Waals structures towards two-dimensional crystals. Nat. Synth. 2, 58–66 (2023)
P.W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: a new kind of insulator? Mater. Res. Bull. 8(2), 153–160 (1973)
L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464(7286), 199–208 (2010)
S. Fujiyama, R. Kato, Fragmented electronic spins with quantum fluctuations in organic Mott insulators near a quantum spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.147204
Kanoda, K., Kato, R.: Mott physics in organic conductors with tri-angular lattices. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2(1), 167–188 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140521
Ueda, K., Fujiyama, S., Kato, R.: Quantum phase transition of an organic spin liquid tuned by mixing counterions. Phys. Rev. B 109, 140401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L140401
Sachdev, S.: Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973765
I. Kimchi, J.P. Sheckelton, T.M. McQueen, P.A. Lee, Scaling and data collapse from local moments in frustrated disordered quantum spin systems. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06800-2
D.M. Eagles, Phys. Rev. 186, 456 (1969)
P. Nozi`eres and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).
M. Greiner, C.A. Regal, D.S. Jin, Nature 426, 537 (2003)
Q.J. Chen et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025002 (2024)
K. Kanoda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 051007 (2006)
Y. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 011016 (2022)
H. Watanabe, H. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. B 111, 085130 (2025)
Y. Kawasugi et al., Nat. Commun. 7, 12356 (2016)
Tan, B. T. G., Lim, H. & Phua, K. K. (Eds.) 2016. 50 years of science in Singapore. World Scientific.
CQT, https://www.quantumlah.org/about/highlight/2024-05-singapore-national-quantum-strategy
BRIN-Q, https://quantumresearch.id/
QTRic, http://qtric.sut.ac.th/
MyQI, https://www.myqi.my/Whether and how this crossover occurs in solids
MyQI. A build-up towards establishing Malaysia’s quantum science and technology initiative by MyQI and Institut Fizik Malaysia (IFM). AAPPS Bulletin 33, 32, 2023.
OneQuantum Philippines, https://www.quantumcomputing.ph/
Philippines Technology Roadmap, https://pcieerd.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/2021/roadmaps/sectoral_roadmaps_division/etdd/Quantum-Technology-RD-Roadmap.pdf
J.P. Dowling, G.J. Milburn, Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, 1809 (2003)
I.H. Deutsch, Harnessing the power of the second quatnum revolution. PRX Quantum 1, 020101 (2020)
Quantum Flagship, https://qt.eu/
M. Riedel, M. Kovacs, P. Zoller, J. Mlynek, T. Clarco, Europe’s quantum flagship initiative. Quantum Science and Technology 4(2), 020501 (2019)
World Economic Forum, Quantum Economy Blueprint, 2024.
ASEAN COSTI, https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community/asean-science-technology-and-innovation/
ASEANQuantum, https://seaqnet.org/
A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.
If you'd like to subscribe to the AAPPS Bulletin newsletter,
enter your email below.