AAPPS bulletin

Research Highlights

Two-dimensional metals by van der Waals squeezing

writerLuojun Du

Vol.35 (Aug) 2025 | Article no.26 2025

1Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100190, China

2School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

Two-dimensional (2D) materials, starting with the groundbreaking exfoliation of graphene in 2004, have initiated the “2D Age” and transformed the landscape of fundamental research and technological advances in condensed-matter physics, materials science, and beyond [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Over the past two decades, the 2D family has markedly expanded and now includes nearly 2000 theoretically predicted and hundreds of laboratory-accessible species with diverse properties [7]. However, these 2D materials are largely limited to layered crystals in which their weak van der Waals (vdW) interlayer interactions facilitate the isolation from their bulk, for example, by top-down exfoliation.

Atomically thin 2D metals stand as highly sought-after materials in condensed-matter physics, which can not only broaden the 2D family beyond vdW layered materials but also promote a variety of theoretical, experimental and technological advances, such as new quantum optical effects, topological edge states, superconductivity, metallic ferroelectricity, quantum Griffiths singularity, superior nonlinearity, catalysis, and all-metallic transistors [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. In fact, if one looks back at the pioneering 2004 paper of Nobel laureates Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov that launched the 2D material field [1], you will find that its original goal, initially, was 2D metals and this is why graphene was highlighted as a metallic material. However, unlike the widely studied 2D vdW layered crystals, metals are highly symmetric and strongly bonded; thus, their 2D forms, especially at the atomically thin limit, tend to be thermodynamically unfavorable and are extremely challenging to realize.

Recently, Zhang’s group at the Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences developed a convenient, universal method dubbed vdW squeezing and realized for the first time large-scale (> 100 µm), truly “all-vdW” 2D metals down to the ångström thickness limit [22, 23]. Figure 1a illustrates the vdW squeezing process. First, a certain amount of metal powder is placed on the bottom monolayer MoS2/sapphire anvil and then heated until it melts to form a droplet (panel I in Fig. 1a). Then, another monolayer MoS2/sapphire, which is utilized as the top anvil, is placed face to face to the bottom anvil, and they move towards each other until they make contact (panel II in Fig. 1a). Subsequently, the liquid metal is gradually squeezed by the two anvils at a high pressure of ~ 200 MPa, roughly double the pressure at the bottom of the Mariana Trench (panel III in Fig. 1a). The squeezing process is maintained until the two opposite anvils are cooled down to room temperature and 2D metals are eventually formed. Finally, MoS2-encapsulated 2D metals on sapphire are realized for subsequent characterization by removing one of the two sapphire substrates (Fig. 1a, panel IV).

Fig. 1
figure 1

vdW squeezing for 2D metals. a Schematic of vdW squeezing process. b Optical microscope images of as-produced 2D metals by vdW squeezing, including Bi, Ga, In, Sn, and Pb. c Atomic force microscope images of as-produced 2D metals in b. The height profiles are superimposed on each individual image. Adapted with permission from Ref [22]


We highlight that a key trick to realizing 2D metals is the use of single crystalline monolayer MoS2 epitaxially grown on sapphire as bottom and top anvils [24]. We envision that graphene, h-BN, and other 2D layered materials can also be used as the vdW anvils for preparation of atomically thin 2D metals [25].

With the vdW squeezing technique, diverse 2D metals (including Bi, Ga, In, Sn, and Pb) are realized (Figs. 1b-c). Remarkably, the thicknesses of these as-produced 2D metals can all reach to the ångström limit, e.g., ~ 6.3 Å for Bi, ~ 5.8 Å for Sn, ~ 7.5 Å for Pb, ~ 8.4 Å for In, and ~ 9.2 Å for Ga (Fig. 1d). The vdW squeezing represents a groundbreaking approach for producing 2D metals, featuring metrics unattainable by previous methods. First, 2D metals by vdW squeezing can be reachable in large sizes, e.g., ~ 100 µm for single crystalline Bi monolayer (Fig. 1b), two orders of magnitude larger than those reported previously [15, 18, 19, 26]. Second, the full-vdW encapsulated characteristics also ensure that the as-produced 2D metals present non-bonded interfaces (i.e., “all-vdW” nature), facilitating the access of intrinsic physical properties. By contrast, most 2D metals previously prepared are covalently bonded to substrates [13], and thus the measured properties are usually non-intrinsic. Third, the as-produced 2D metal films are full-vdW encapsulated by MoS2 monolayers and therefore are extremely environmentally stable. Notably, the encapsulated monolayer Bi can last at least one year in an atmospheric environment without degradation or oxidation. Last but not least, the vdW squeezing methodology facilitates the realization of 2D metals with various thicknesses (such as one-, two- and three-unit-cell thick) by controlling the squeezing pressure, providing a firm basis for the exploration of fascinating layer-dependent physical properties.

Undoubtedly, this is just the beginning of 2D metal field, and there are plenty of new opportunities and emerging technological applications to be eagerly awaited. For example, the physical properties of 2D metals are a “new frontier” but have not yet been explored. Consequently, an important future research frontier is to explore and control the unique properties of 2D metals through different external degrees of freedom (such as ultrafast optical excitations, electric and magnetic fields, strain, twist angle, doping, pressure, and Floquet engineering). This will facilitate the opportunities of underpinning emerging quantum states of matter, addressing important fundamental problems in condensed-matter physics and materials science, and initiating original breakthroughs “from 0 to 1.” We envision that by integrating with other systems (e.g., optical cavities, resonances, silicon-based waveguides, and fibers), 2D metals will outline a bright vision for numerous emerging electronic, photonic and optoelectronic applications.

References

  1. K.S. Novoselov et al., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004)

  2. A.K. Geim, I.V. Van der Grigorieva, Waals heterostructures. Nature 499, 419–425 (2013)

  3. Novoselov, KS, Mishchenko, A, Carvalho, A & Castro Neto, AH. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353, aac9439 (2016).

  4. Du, L. et al. Moiré photonics and optoelectronics. Science 379, eadg0014 (2023).

  5. L. Du et al., Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials. Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 193–206 (2021)

  6. L. Du et al., Nonlinear physics of moiré superlattices. Nat. Mater. 23, 1179–1192 (2024)

  7. N. Mounet et al., Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252 (2018)

  8. Y. Chen et al., Two-dimensional metal nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Chem. Rev. 118, 6409–6455 (2018)

  9. Y. Xing et al., Quantum Griffiths singularity of superconductor-metal transition in Ga thin films. Science 350, 542–545 (2015)

  10. R.A. Maniyara et al., Tunable plasmons in ultrathin metal films. Nat. Photon. 13, 328–333 (2019)

  11. T. Zhang et al., Superconductivity in one-atomic-layer metal films grown on Si(111). Nat. Phys. 6, 104–108 (2010)

  12. B. Jäck et al., Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel. Science 364, 1255–1259 (2019)

  13. N. Briggs et al., Atomically thin half-van der Waals metals enabled by confinement heteroepitaxy. Nat. Mater. 19, 637–643 (2020)

  14. T.K. Sahu et al., Microwave synthesis of molybdenene from MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1430–1438 (2023)

  15. J. Gou et al., Two-dimensional ferroelectricity in a single-element bismuth monolayer. Nature 617, 67–72 (2023)

  16. M.A. Steves et al., Unexpected near-infrared to visible nonlinear optical properties from 2-d polar metals. Nano Lett. 20, 8312–8318 (2020)

  17. F.-F. Zhu et al., Epitaxial growth of two-dimensional stanene. Nat. Mater. 14, 1020–1025 (2015)

  18. F. Reis et al., Bismuthene on a SiC substrate: a candidate for a high-temperature quantum spin Hall material. Science 357, 287–290 (2017)

  19. K.-H. Jin, E. Oh, R. Stania, F. Liu, H.W. Yeom, Enhanced Berry Curvature Dipole and Persistent Spin Texture in the Bi(110) Monolayer. Nano Lett. 21, 9468–9475 (2021)

  20. Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO3. Chin. Phys. Lett. 29, 037402 (2012).

  21. M.-Q. Ren et al., Tuning the electronic states and superconductivity in alkali fulleride films. AAPPS Bull. 32, 1 (2022)

  22. J. Zhao et al., Realization of 2D metals at the ångström thickness limit. Nature 639, 354–359 (2025)

  23. J. Sanchez-Yamagishi, Metals squeezed to thickness of two atoms. Nature 639, 309 (2025)

  24. L. Li et al., Epitaxy of wafer-scale single-crystal MoS2 monolayer via buffer layer control. Nat. Commun. 15, 1825 (2024)

  25. L. Chen et al., Exceptional electronic transport and quantum oscillations in thin bismuth crystals grown inside van der Waals materials. Nat. Mater. 23, 741–746 (2024)

  26. K. Jiang et al., Mechanical cleavage of non-van der Waals structures towards two-dimensional crystals. Nat. Synth. 2, 58–66 (2023)

  27. P.W. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: a new kind of insulator? Mater. Res. Bull. 8(2), 153–160 (1973)

  28. L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets. Nature 464(7286), 199–208 (2010)

  29. S. Fujiyama, R. Kato, Fragmented electronic spins with quantum fluctuations in organic Mott insulators near a quantum spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.147204

  30. Kanoda, K., Kato, R.: Mott physics in organic conductors with tri-angular lattices. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 2(1), 167–188 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-062910-140521

  31. Ueda, K., Fujiyama, S., Kato, R.: Quantum phase transition of an organic spin liquid tuned by mixing counterions. Phys. Rev. B 109, 140401 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L140401

  32. Sachdev, S.: Quantum Phase Transitions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973765

  33. I. Kimchi, J.P. Sheckelton, T.M. McQueen, P.A. Lee, Scaling and data collapse from local moments in frustrated disordered quantum spin systems. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 4367 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06800-2

  34. D.M. Eagles, Phys. Rev. 186, 456 (1969)

  35. P. Nozi`eres and S. Schmitt-Rink, J. Low Temp. Phys. 59, 195 (1985).

  36. M. Greiner, C.A. Regal, D.S. Jin, Nature 426, 537 (2003)

  37. Q.J. Chen et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 025002 (2024)

  38. K. Kanoda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 051007 (2006)

  39. Y. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 011016 (2022)

  40. H. Watanabe, H. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. B 111, 085130 (2025)

  41. Y. Kawasugi et al., Nat. Commun. 7, 12356 (2016)

  42. Tan, B. T. G., Lim, H. & Phua, K. K. (Eds.) 2016. 50 years of science in Singapore. World Scientific.

  43. CQT, https://www.quantumlah.org/about/highlight/2024-05-singapore-national-quantum-strategy

  44. BRIN-Q, https://quantumresearch.id/

  45. QTRic, http://qtric.sut.ac.th/

  46. MyQI, https://www.myqi.my/Whether and how this crossover occurs in solids

  47. MyQI. A build-up towards establishing Malaysia’s quantum science and technology initiative by MyQI and Institut Fizik Malaysia (IFM). AAPPS Bulletin 33, 32, 2023.

  48. OneQuantum Philippines, https://www.quantumcomputing.ph/

  49. Philippines Technology Roadmap, https://pcieerd.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/2021/roadmaps/sectoral_roadmaps_division/etdd/Quantum-Technology-RD-Roadmap.pdf

  50. J.P. Dowling, G.J. Milburn, Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 361, 1809 (2003)

  51. I.H. Deutsch, Harnessing the power of the second quatnum revolution. PRX Quantum 1, 020101 (2020)

  52. Quantum Flagship, https://qt.eu/

  53. M. Riedel, M. Kovacs, P. Zoller, J. Mlynek, T. Clarco, Europe’s quantum flagship initiative. Quantum Science and Technology 4(2), 020501 (2019)

  54. World Economic Forum, Quantum Economy Blueprint, 2024.

  55. ASEAN COSTI, https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community/asean-science-technology-and-innovation/

  56. ASEANQuantum, https://seaqnet.org/

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Consortia

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

A list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.

 

[Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43673-025-00165-7]